Good Stuff NW
Featuring stuff that is good in the NW
LOST Magazine
LOST Magazine is an online monthly magazine that combines elements of many other literary, online, and national magazines with a singular mission--to reclaim in writing lost people, places, and things.
Outside Is America
A journal about photography, roadtrips, trains and life, with occasional detours into movies, baseball, music, family and more.
The Photographers' Railroad Page
Good photos usually have good stories to go with them.... The goal of The Photographers' Railroad Page is to provide an outlet for top quality photographs and their story.
Portland Transport Blog
A Conversation About Access & Mobility in the Portland/Vancouver Region
PowellsBooks.Blog
Authors, readers, critics, media -- and booksellers
Rambling West
The musings of a farmer with a typewriter and camera
Stumptown Confidential
Documenting Portland, Oregon architecture, history, and culture through photos, postcards, and words.
The Unauthorized Observer
Observations on faith, photography, trains, baseball, the city where I live (Fullerton, Calif.), anything that I find funny (a lot of things) or irritating (some things) and various incidents involving friends and family.
Under the Weather
...the open road, fatherhood, family life, music, railroads, photography, popular and unpopular culture, sex, violence, religion, the oppression of consumerism and capitalism and the general bullshit that makes up modern life.
Urban Planning Overlord
A blog to counter the myths, lies, and demagoguery others use against sound city planning to further their own ends, fair and foul - but also to urge the profession itself to pull back from the occasional wretched PC exces.
VanPortlander
Living in Vancouver; working in Portland. I have some thoughts.
Whiskey, Texas
...life and experiences in Texas and the Southwest. Recurring themes: Photography, railroads, fading ads / ghost signs, fallen-flag railroad logos, boxcars, bicycling, Texas music, pop culture, sports, road trips, literature, kids and family.
World Scott
The Travel Writing and Photography of Scott Lothes
Can we have a time-out on the whole streetcar expansion thing?
Recently, the Oregonian printed a story on the impending Portland Streetcar System Plan. What's really interesting is to compare the system's proposed map, (as shown here in a Big O rendering,) with historic maps of the Portland Traction system, such as this one from 1924. They are amazingly similar.
The historian/nostalgist in me thinks this is really really cool. The pragmatist in me has a warning. One of the -- if not the primary -- goals of streetcar construction is development. This is nothing new really. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, streetcar lines were built to areas like Sunnyside or Council Crest specifically with development in mind. They opened up farmland to become subdivision stock, making fast commutes from outlying areas possible for the first time. In many cases lines were "aimed" into areas where land was empty and cheap.
And this puts the first hurdle in the way of the Streetcar System Plan: by largely copying the old Portland Traction alignments, it is adhering to a development pattern of a century ago, and not necessarily of today. This puts redevelopment smack in the middle of some of Portland's more vital neighborhoods. Do we really want or need to tear up Hawthorne or Belmont to install multi-story condo developments? Because that's one of the likely results of putting a streetcar in on these streets.
* * *
There's another problem too, and it also requires a brief history lesson.
Portland's now lamented streetcar system morphed into today's TriMet bus system. Most of the areas that Portland Traction's trolly lines established are the primary neighborhoods of today. Due to this, TriMet's bus routes mimic to an amazing degree the former streetcar lines, and in many cases can directly trace their existence to them, having evolved from streetcar to trolly-bus to diesel bus.
If the streetcar were about transportation, and not development, it might make a lot of sense to build these lines. It is, after all, where a lot of people are going to and from today.
But... uh... what about the buses?
By replicating the old Portland Traction routes, the Portland Streetcar is making a financial stab at the heart of TriMet's territory. Until now, the streetcar served primarily as a people mover in the downtown area, where most of the TriMet service is free anyway. The eastside streetcar loop is starting to get into TriMet's transportation territory, but could be considered as no more than a downtown extension over to the central eastside. There is no question that installing a second transit alternative on the exact same corridors as frequent service TriMet buses will effect bus boardings, and as a result TriMet farebox revenues.
It's the transit equivalent of Julius Ceaser's 49 BC march across the Rubicon river. It might be speculated that TriMet doesn't look too kindly on this streetcar plan, and I can't blame them. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the workers on S.E. 17th found themselves voting for Sho Dozono over streetcar guru Sam Adams for mayor.
* * *
There's another issue of course, and it's just a small one: financing.
Although streetcars are far cheaper than light rail to build, they are far less popular with the Federal Transit Administration. One of the main reasons behind this is that streetcars just don't carry that many people. They serve as people movers or local pedestrian circulators, but they don't serve commute functions to any significant degree.
What streetcars do well is bring in economic development. It's one of the reasons I greatly admire the mode, and think they are good things to build. However, it's also something that is hard to quantify, and the FTA currently does not use economic development indicators as a significant tool in deciding how to make expenditures of federal funds.
The current 8-mile streetcar loop (4 miles each way) weighs in at a total construction cost of approximately $87 million. To establish bidirectional service, then, each mile would cost around $22 million. It doesn't take much staring at the proposed system map to see that the extensions outweigh the current system by many times. If there is no federal money, where will the financing come from? Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) cannot raise the money all on their own.
* * *
These are hardly the only issues. How, for example, will the streetcar fare against congestion? They can't weave around traffic impediments like buses can. The cars themselves cost about the same as three standard TriMet buses -- and for the money that means TriMet buses can offer more frequent service at a higher passenger capacity for the same money -- and without the need to tear up city streets.
But is this all academic? Does Adams really intend to build this many streetcar lines? Or is he applying his Machiavellian brand of politics to Portland, by making campaign promises he has no intention of keeping? It should be noted that by proposing streetcars for all the historic routes, he touches on Portland's brand of self-involved nostalgia while also promising "a streetcar in every pot" for nearly every neighborhood in the city.
Does any of this plan make sense? Perhaps. Certainly the peninsula of North Portland is under-served by transit, but I suspect that a better approach would be a spur line of Expo MAX, perhaps to a transit center in St. Johns or even beyond in Rivergate.
A better idea would be to install the streetcar along Sandy out to Parkrose. Sandy Boulevard is in many places well behind the times, and ripe for redevelopment. Its diagonal route cuts across so many neighborhoods that it would spread the economic impact of the project more than any other single proposal on the system plan map. It would still have impacts on TriMet service, however the 12 bus that serves Sandy is already over capacity and slow; any additional service here would be welcome. Most of all, it would help to turn over a strip of road that desperately needs public attention, which means that it's a relevant redevelopment for 21st century Portland. The fact that it's also someplace Portland Traction once ran would be a nice symmetry, but no more.
Most of all, however, what I feel we need is a breather. Streetcar building is not an end-all answer to every need the city has, and we need to stop giving it a Barack Obama-like mania. Yes, it's cool. But transportation should be designed with a clear and level head.
Pronouncements of doom for various car styles have always amused me. Some time ago, my mother covered a screen with newspaper clippings of British sports cars -- the covers of magazines, newspaper articles, even classified advertisements. One of the articles is written in the late 1970s, and predicted the doom of the convertible. New U.S. safety standards, you see, made them inherently unsafe, and therefore it was only a matter of time before they would be gone from the market, a memory from the past.
The mess gave me one of those "what ever happened to" moments regarding Mike Thorne. You might recall that Thorne used to be director of Port of Portland and quit to run for governor. When he dropped out of the race, he went to run the ferries in Washington.
So what's become of Mike? And can he be blamed (rightly or wrongly) for any of Washington's water-borne mess? Well he quit the ferry job in 2004 and returneed to Pendleton. As Seattle Times staff writer Susan Gilmore put it in 2004,
"He said he came into the job with huge expectations, that he'd be able to achieve financial footing with no plan how to get there. Raising ferry fares drove away customers, voters rejected Referendum 51, which would have dumped billions of dollars into state transportation projects, and there were no plans how to replace the aging state ferries, some 70 years old."
And now? Notice that "Big Look" land use review that the legislature wants to fund? Thorne's a member. That may or may not mean anything -- put your tinfoil conspiracy hats on now if you wish -- but I find it an interesting path for someone who thought themselves a gubernatorial contender.
Which brings up another question: what ever happened to Ron Saxton?
* * *
Also up in Seattle, the Big O reports that it may only be a matter of time before the Sonics move to Oklahoma. The single commenter on the Big O's story says "who cares".
I have a question for you, ladies and gentleman. Who owns the Blazers? Where does he live? And what might he do if Seattle no longer had a pro basketball team?
* * *
Lastly, a food related story. Author Michael Pollan has been making the local circuit here lately, sending parts of the Portlandfood blogosphere into titters. Why? Pollan has written a book that dares to suggest that we should eat food, not "food substitutes".
Pollan has some interesting things to say, and Edible Portland sat down and did a video interview with him. The first part is here. I found Pollan's comments about Sour Cream and tofu-based meat substitutes to be so common-sense based that I had to pinch myself that I was hearing these words at all. Can it be? Might sugar and butter be... acceptable? It's so sad to think that Julia Child -- who seemed to improve any recipe by adding either butter or "booze" to it -- didn't live to see this day.
Thanks to the good old viral hokey-pokey, this installment of Week in Review is a tad late. It seems everybody has caught it, or some variant of it, this week. Ugh. I'm still recovering but I'm at least functional again. I also managed to donate a significant amount of money to the "keep Ricola making cough-drops" fund. Thank you, Switzerland!
* * *
A lot of streetcar noise this week. Portland Transport on Monday broke news that the new loop for the Eastside had made the President's budget. Metro is now seeking public comment on the project.
The AP story, however, has not gone down well with some:
"But the federal agency said that the Portland transit agency, TriMet, has to develop better ridership models and show the benefits of the streetcar system to get past the last hurdle for funding in 2009."
The Portland Streetcar, Inc., is not a division or affiliation of TriMet. Although TriMet has handled making federal funding applications for them, they are not responsible for planning decisions on the streetcar.
Meanwhile I can't help but feel that the grand expansionist visions of the streetcar system are eventually going to come into direct conflict with TriMet's extensive bus system. Why would the agency view streetcars on their bus routes, taking their riders and their fares, with anything other than alarm and anger? It makes no sense to build a competing system in the city; neither TriMet nor PSI will be healthier for it.
* * *
The remaining transportation roundup jumps all over the place. Also on Monday, a MAX train struck a TriMet bus downtown. Thankfully there were only minor injuries to one person on the bus, and no injuries to anyone else.
On Tuesday the Oregonian published a story on the design of the Columbia Crossing project. The story laments how plain the new bridge will be. At $4.2 billion, I'm not sure if all this debate will be moot anyway.
On Wednesday the Roseburg News Review put up a rather amusing Op-Ed on the closure of the Central Oregon & Pacific's Coos Bay line. The name "Snidely Whiplash" is used. Why do I feel that I need the voice of Edward Everett Horton to read the story out loud?
"One senator read a constituent's e-mail message.... [suggesting] replacing MAX with express buses that have drivers who can monitor riders."
It's nice to see the politicos are now being blatant asses by reading ludicrous comments such as that. After investing how many hundreds of millions -- its probably over a billion -- in federal and state funds, we should abandon our investment and convert back to buses? All so we can have a false appearance of safety? Or, well, you know, we could add, uh... enforcement?
In the photography world, Whiskey Texas has a lot of new stuff. Grain elevators, buZ blurr, and anti-sagging-pants billboards. Strange combinations, Wes.
Graffiti has been a subject of debate a lot in the Portland area last year, thanks partly to Randy Leonard's anti-graffiti measures. I want to touch on the topic a bit, but from a different perspective, from the standpoint of a photographer making images of it.
Truth be told, graffiti is there. It's part of the real world we live in. To pretend that freight cars in LA ought to be shiny and sparkle is to live in a fantasy land inside our heads, not in reality. There is at least a little bit of photojournalism in railroad photography, isn't there?
Yet it does tear at me. I'm a big believer in order. Which isn't to say my desk doesn't look like a war zone. It's more that I feel that we need more respect in the world, not less. Humor is fine, farce is fine, sarcasm is fine. We're adults, we should be tough enough to stand that. But graffiti... isn't that basically vandalism?
And so I'm stuck taking photos of things I don't approve of.
In 2006 I took a traditional photography course at a community college, in order to get some training in basic darkroom technique. (I'm a wannabe dinosaur, forgive me my strange habits). For my finals project, I concentrated on railroad graffiti. It was on my mind a lot as I traded emails with Jeff and with my friend Scott Lothes on the subject, trying to make sense of it all. In the end, the correspondence and the project ended up merging late last year.
At the end of the project, my attitude is still ambiguous. I feel that if I'm really trying to do something meaningful about understanding the railroad landscape, I can't ignore graffiti. Yet in a way it's a glorification of it to photograph it. I'm still searching for an answer. Perhaps I will never find it.
Check out the essay here and see if you can find any answers of your own.
Thanks to Jeff and Scott for helping out with this project, and thanks to Martin Burwash for his candid critique.
Well can anyone remember a stretch of cold weather thats lasted as long as this? Sure, we've had colder winters, and more snow, and more ice. However, I cannot recall a winter in my (relatively short) lifetime thats been as cold for as long. It's enough to make me want to stock up on things like scarves, gloves, and flannel-lined pants. What is this... Ohio?
Of course the proposal is not quite dead yet. Instead it's going to be "studied" more. Some, however, are of the opinion that the supposed link between farebox recovery and violent crime is a farce.
I must agree. The crime problem on TriMet is real, but it's more widespread than MAX and it's not primarily downtown!!. Indeed I had a discussion with a friend at one of the major newspapers in town, and he did a bit of research on the MAX attacks. Guess what? Most of the criminals involved in the crimes lived within 1-2 miles of where the crimes had been committed.
We need to have a serious discussion about security -- system-wide and in all modes -- not about Fareless Square. This isn't to say we won't be looking at fares as part of a solution, after all security must be funded, and costs are not going down for the bus system. But our first concern needs to be security personnel on the ground, and probably station redesigns to eliminate security hazards like brick walls people can hide behind.
TriMet's Mary Fetsch on today's Lars Larson show has mentioned that the agency is re-adjusting its security to put security officers on transit vehicles at least 75% of the time. Yet the agency is still proposing that Fareless Square's elimination is a tool towards increasing security. To be fair, she did mention the disconnect with the Fareless proposal and the large number of incidents occurring in Gresham.
* * *
Sam Adam's street maintenance plan won't be split into three proposals after all. The reason offered: advice of legal counsel to the City. Willamette Week, however, reports a different take: it's all about a deal with the Oregon Petroleum Association that gives them a lower rate.
"They didn't get what they wanted, but we compromised on their rate," Adams said.... "Now that they've agreed not to pursue a referral, I feel comfortable moving forward with one ordinance," said Adams, who's running for mayor."
I am actually, amazingly, in favor of tolling on freeways. However, I can't see how tolling just this bridge will work. And I am highly skeptical of all these electronic tolling systems. One of the points of this project was supposed to be to remove an alleged choke-point on I-5. As the project proceeds further and further, it's becoming more and more apparent that the new bridge will itself be a choke point, and a highly overpriced one at that.
I think we have now reached the point where the law of diminishing returns kicks in. Lets just maintain the current, perfectly safe bridge, and forget it. I won't dare mention the idea of a supplemental bridge cutting across Sauvie's Island to connect Washington County to Clark County, of course....
* * *
Rounding out the news, the Daily Astorian has an update on the Port of Tillamook Bay Railroad. The line, which links rural Tillamook with national markets, experienced major damage during early December 2007, and remains out of service. Reading the tea leaves, it's really starting to look like the Tillamook Branch may be gone for good.
This is a major challenge for how the state addresses the needs of low-volume rural areas. If the rail line is not rebuilt, it will have a major impact on Tillamook County's economy. And if the state does not provide some alternate solution, it will be telling rural areas across Oregon that they are not a priority in Salem -- a mixed message at a time when ODOT is promoting the Connect Oregon project.
* * *
I have a soft spot for British automobiles, having grown up in the back seat of a 1959 Triumph TR3. Thus the future of the Jaguar marquee has been of great interest, which is why this report about difficulties between current owner Ford and future owner Tata Motors is slightly disturbing. Lets hope this doesn't mean the deal falls off.
Once upon a time in Public-Broadcasting-Land, there was a show called Masterpiece Theater. It was a variety drama show, much like the old "Carnation Milk Presents" shows that aired on broadcast television in the U.S. throughout the '50s. (In fact, oil giant Mobile used to sponsor Masterpiece, and it was known as "Mobile Masterpiece Theater"). Each week the host -- first Alistair Cook, later New York Times columnist Russell Baker -- would introduce a classic work of literature (and occasionally an original screenplay) that had been made into a film. In some ways this series was the ultimate intellectual feather-in-the-cap for PBS.
Apparently that's not so much the case anymore. PBS has re-branded the series as "Masterpiece Classics" -- a case of painfully obvious duplicative phrasing if ever there was one -- and has replaced Baker with actress Gillian Anderson. The move is reminiscent of NBC's recent decision to use the actor Micheal Douglas as voice talent for the NBC Nightly News. As the Ellen & Jim blog put it:
"The appearance and demeanor of the introducer, Gillian Anderson, her talks and inset commercials (if we needed more evidence) show how little respect the PBS stations now have for their audience. Their original goal which was to have an alternative place for intelligent talk and decent art. Anderson is made up grotesquely; she leers at the audience; I expect she knows little of Austen for real or the 18th century, but the people who wrote the speeches clearly also know little. I didn’t stay for her closing one -- it actually comes after a commercial. PBS now puts commercials inside their shows. They assume the audience will sit through the commercial for the sake of watching and listening to this woman again."
Ouch.
They're also getting heat for having cut up the recent Jane Austen film adaptations so much to have made a joke of the original material. (Hat tip via the Chronicle Blog).
* * *
Kevin Scanlon sends along notice of an interview on Public Radio International's Studio 360 with the photographer David Plowden. Plowden has recently published a retrospective book titled David Plowden: Vanishing Point: Fifty Years of Photography. (I will be reviewing it sometime next week). Studio 360 took the time to visit with Plowden in New York and has made their interview available in audio format. The interview is about 12 minutes long, and in it you can hear Plowden's sense of wonder and personal curiosity shining through. For an admirer of Plowden's work, I found the interview informative and inspiring:
In addition to the main interview, Studio 360 has made available a 4-minute bonus interview with Plowden on his fascination with bridges:
If the embedded players do not work for you, the interviews are available as downloadable .mp3 formats from their issue archive page. (It's on the right).
* * *
One last note before I go. While we're discussing photography, Martin Burwash has another photo essay up. Check it out.
Have a great weekend, and look for some book reviews before the next Week in Review.
While you're there, check out this acerbic piece by Corey Pein. I don't think I've read as entertaining of a summing-up of the Portland political landscape in a while. Informative while hilarious; well done.
And while we're on Portland subjects, just a brief note that quid pro quo is alive and well.
"The Commission is working to examine not only the condition and future needs of the nation's surface transportation system, but also short and long-term alternatives to replace or supplement the fuel tax as the principal revenue source to support the Highway Trust Fund over the next 30 years."
Since the report was released only two days ago, I have yet to open it much less digest it. Regarding the production of the report, a source of mine wrote:
"...all work was done by or for US-DOT directly. I reported to Susan Binder, executive director of the Commission and deputy secretary of USDOT. She reports to Mary Peters, [Secretary] of US-DOT who reports to George W. Bush who probably doesn’t know or care what we are doing. But I am in the fourth layer down from The Top. This is the highest I have ever been or am ever likely to be."
It will be interesting to see what exactly the report -- called for in 2005's transportation funding bill -- consists of, much less recommends. Apparently one of the recommendations is a $0.40 hike in the Federal gas tax, something that Portland Transport reports isn't going down well with the administration. I'll take a look at the report later this week, and will likely have some thoughts.
"LOST Magazine is an online monthly magazine that combines elements of many other literary, online, and national magazines with a singular mission--to reclaim in writing lost people, places, and things."
For lovers of history, nostalgia junkies, as well as obsessive collectors of obscure trivia, it's a really cool site. Lost is a welcome addition to our blogroll. Check it out.
* * *
Speaking of lost things and blogrolls, I stumbled onto this cool site this week. Sleek design, neat concept, great content, luscious photos. Sadly, it's not updated anymore. As a former boss of mine used to say, "drat".
* * *
All the blog overload has lead me to try out an RSS reader. No Safari has one built in, but all the geeky types are using standalone RSS Readers. With an overload of blogs to keep up with, I thought, hey, why not try this out? So lately I've been trying a few, and I've found my favorite so far, an app called Vienna. It's sleek, so far it doesn't hiccup too much, and on an added note I can view web pages directly in it rather than opening a browser. (It uses the Safari architecture to power a simple browser function).
Nick's reminds me a bit of the pictures of the original Camp Washington Chili in Cincinatti. Camp Washington modernized in the last decade or so; Nick's stayed blessedly old school and blessedly Portland.
Alas, no more. Wonder if it will be condos, or apartments?
* * *
More Portland news: Friday the city will be putting on a press event celebrating the 50th anniversary of... parking enforcement?
"(PORTLAND, OR) -- The City of Portland Office of Transportation's Parking Enforcement Division will celebrate its 50th anniversary on Friday, January 18, 2008. The media are invited to attend this special event that includes an entertaining slide show presentation on the history of parking enforcement in Portland."
What next? Can we have a 100th anniversary of indoor plumbing event?
I'm from the mp3 generation and love their flexibility and portability. That said, vinyl is way better than anything you can hear these days. Once more its a case of modern digital technology replacing a superior analog one. Mass production always has more upsides than downsides, but it's always a loss in quality too.
How reducing hours on downtown's Fareless Square will improve safety in Gresham, where most of the violence on the system occurs, is beyond me. Here is the Trib's story on the matter.
The hearings are this Wednesday, the 16th, one near Lloyd Center and one downtown. (See here for details).
Personally I don't see how this is going to help things at all. The majority of the crime is not downtown, but at the extremities of the system, especially Gresham. What is needed is more enforcement, not an inconveniencing of non-criminal users.
Further, the downtown area is a site of numerous bars, clubs, & entertainment venues. It seems smart to leave Fareless Square operating all evening, allowing less-than-sober (but law abiding) Portlanders to get around downtown without being behind a wheel.
And meanwhile, enforcing the new fare restrictions will require yet more fare inspectors and transit police downtown, when where they are needed, once again, is in places like Gresham and to a lesser extent Hillsboro.
If you can't make the meetings, you can send written testimony by mail to: TriMet-MK2 4012 SE 17th Ave Portland, OR 97202
You can also submit comments via email at comments@trimet.org . The deadline for both is 5 PM, Thursday, February 21st.
Recently, Portland City Commissioner (and Mayoral candidate) Sam Adams and County Commissioner Ted Wheeler have been promoting a new revenue plan to fund street maintenance. The fee would be a City of Portland fee, and the city has put up a website for the proposal:
"The Safe, Sound and Green Streets Proposal was conceived to address longstanding transportation maintenance issues in the City of Portland and deficiencies in Multnomah County's Willamette River bridges. The Oregon state gas tax was last increased in 1993, which has meant that funding for transportation safety and maintenance has not kept pace with inflation or the increasing demands of a growing population. As a result, the City of Portland has $422 million in unmet maintenance needs. Likewise, Multnomah County faces a $485 million shortfall for bridge maintenance. Because of this underinvestment, our community faces needless deaths and injuries on Portland's streets that create an estimated annual economic impact of $412 million.
To address these unmet needs, the Safe, Sound and Green Streets Stakeholder Committee was formed to develop a proposal that would begin to address the worst of the city's unmet maintenance needs. Specifically, these include city arterial streets in poor and very poor condition, City and County bridges, signals in poor condition, and key safety needs. The proposal envisions new funding sources for both the City and County as well as a specific list of street maintenance, bridge and safety projects that would be completed with new revenue."
Many have come out of the woodwork to oppose the plan. Certainly questions remain about how equitable it is, and whether the city has had its budget priorities straight in the past, or if the populace is now being asked to bailout a shortfall that is the consequence of bad investments. Even the Willamette Week has criticized the proposal.
Sensitive as I am to the need to fund public infrastructure, my initial reaction to all such plans is skepticism. I must give Sam & Co kudos, however, for providing a budget for the proposal. I also must credit Sam with guts to push for this at a time when he's seeking a higher office.
The heart of the matter is the argument that gas tax revenues no longer supply enough revenue to cover transportation projects. The state gas tax is a fixed rate of $0.24 per gallon. While gas prices have been rising, gas taxes have remained at a flat rate, denying the public any direct benefit of higher gas prices. In short, less percentage of your money spent at the pump is returning to the streets, and more is going to the gas company.
The Portland Department of Transportation also argues that "[t]he Portland region receives only 46 cents back for every dollar we send to Salem in gas tax and vehicle registration fees". Even if true, this isn't necessarily a bad thing. One of the roles that a large city plays is to be the engine -- in public revenue generation as well as economically -- for a state or region. (If true, though -- and it likely is -- it certainly counters arguments that the rest of the state is subsidizing Portland's transportation choices).
One of the best arguments for the need for new revenue is that "[s]ince 1993, the cost for materials to repair our streets and bridges has increased by 70%..." As the P-DOT website says, "one dollar in 1993 equals 58 cents in today's market." Rising costs of concrete and steel have driven up construction costs for both the public and private sectors. Many projects -- including the new Westside Express Service -- have made major project design cuts and still are having problems staying within the originally budget numbers.
Even if the shortfall is conceded as real, is this proposal to fill it the correct choice? As the Willy Week puts it:
"The tax does far more than fix potholes: Adams' office has emphasized the city's deteriorating streets, often stressing $422 million in unmet maintenance needs. Nobody would deny the city's streets are in lousy shape, with a growing 627-mile backlog of streets in crummy condition. Yet a healthy $24.2 million -- or about 5 percent of the total tax -- won't go for maintenance but for building 112 miles of new 'bike boulevards'"
It's certain that there's going to be some major questions about the "bike boulevard" proposal. Beyond just explaining what exactly they are, where they go, or what they look like, there's going to be some vocal opposition. As it stands, bikes do not pay into the transportation system in any user-based way, unlike cars & trucks. This may end up becoming more fuel for proposals to require bike registration or bike licensing.
This FAQ helps to answer many questions about transportation in Portland in general, as well as how the city got to where it is today. For example, it points out (correctly) that the P-DOT does not pay for the construction of streetcars or light rail with state gas tax dollars. What it leaves out? It doesn't say anything about non-gas tax revenues, the impact of LIDs on overall city property tax revenues, nor on whether gas taxes help subsidize improvements near such developments. Also, how does P-DOT pay for the streetcar's operations?
One question that nags me. How much of the funds raised will go towards actual shovels in the ground? I grant, some costs will have to go to overhead like engineering and some planning. But still -- how much of this is funding the projects, and how much of it is going to pay for, say, more personnel at P-DOT?
P-DOT also claims that the department has had to cut their budget for the last 7 years in a row. It would be interesting to know in what areas these cuts were made, and why.
In the FAQ, there is the following question & answer:
"Question: Due to a strong economy, Portland had higher than anticipated revenue over the last 2 fiscal years. Why didn't City Council spend some of these funds on transportation?
Answer: These one-time-only general funds were allocated for other council priorities like police and affordable housing. Transportation received one-fifth of these funds for specific safety projects. This amount is not sufficient to cover P-DOT's ongoing maintenance funding shortfall. Had more money been given to transportation, other essential public services such as parks and public safety would have received less."
I think this gets to the heart of questions like those raised at VanPortlander. Can the situation that P-DOT finds itself in now be partially the result of the council placing their budget priorities in other areas?
P-DOT states that other cities are seeking similar proposals to pay for their own projects, and this is quite true. This is true, but how well is it working? In some cases, not so well.
I think Adams and P-DOT makes a strong case for the budget shortfall and for their proposed solution. It remains to be seen if it will fly with voters, however. A number of gas station owners are attempting to band together and put the issue on the May ballot. If they succeed, we will see a public debate about the city's budget priorities emerge. Let's hope it's not as ugly as the Interstate debacle was.
And yes, I'm aware of the hypocrisy of saying that on a blog.
* * *
Speaking of book reviews, there's been a lot of bally-hoo about their decline in recent memory. You know the drill, the usual "the Internet killed the radio star" schtick. There's definitely a bit of truth to it, although I wouldn't go shouting about the demise of the book just yet.
Of course, as a freelancer, book reviews can be a major pain. Getting review copies is difficult, and I just plain can't afford to buy every book I want to review. On the other hand, I'm a confirmed book-a-holic. End result? Most of my reviews will be of books going into my library anyway. This includes both new and out-of-print, used books, but hey, we live in the state that gave the world Powell's Books, so that's not that big of a problem now is it?
While we're on the subject of book buying and wishlists and the like, a minor rant. Why can't Powell's have a wishlist function similar to Amazon, that would let others see what you are wanting to buy? It would be especially handy during the holidays, and I would far rather send prospective gift-buyers and friends to Powell's than to mega-monster Amazon.
It wouldn't hurt to let use have some simplified profiles too, for those of us who post reviews on their site.
* * *
And one more book-related item. I would be remiss not to add the PowellsBooks.Blog to the blogroll at left.
* * *
And then there's the Blogosphere! Yet more additions. Photographer & graphic designer Dave Styffe brings us The Unauthorized Observer; a very noir title for his SoCal photoblog. This is followed up by news that Elrond Lawrence has started another, titled Outside Is America.
The holidays are over at last, and many are still groaning under the weight of the feasting. it wasn't the vast Christmas repasts that hit me, though, so much as the culinary delights of Portland.
I almost feel sorry for the Portland Building. How overjoyed the city was when it was first built. A fine example of cutting edge, post-modern architecture, designed by rising-star architect Michael Graves. We were lucky, and it made Graves a real powerhouse, designing everything from major buildings to consumer goods for Target.
Time has not treated the building well, however, and it has become the building Portlanders love to hate. (Granted, it is a bit of a maintenance nightmare now).
Poor thing. Portland is one of those cities where nobody will ever stare at you, because you'll never manage to be the weirdest person on the block. In a way, the Portland Building fits in a city like that -- hell if anything it's too tame for a city like that.
Oh, don't get me wrong though; I don't like the building either.
Plenty has been said elsewhere about these events. You can always go over to Bojack for the latest.
Sten's departure will leave a much larger hole in the council. Presuming that Adams is elected mayor, it means two spots are open, in addition to Randy running for his seat again. Sten's departure makes it far easier to change the majority make up of the council in one election sweep.
As for Sho? I'll say only this: Sho fills a vacuum. Before him, there was the potential for a serious contender to emerge. Sho seems like a nice guy, but Portland politics isn't about being nice. If I were Sam, I'd be really happy about all this.
* * *
Will the weather madness never end? Vancouver gets a tornado. They do happen in the region now and then.
As usual, the media are making a big fuss, giving us tornado survival advice now that the tornado is gone and after having given no warning.
* * *
I like Tigard Mayor Craig Dirksen. He's a nice guy, and he has the best of intentions. I often find myself defending him when people suggest he's too soft. For once though I must issue a minor rebuke. In his state of the city address, Craig says he has really only good news to tell you.
Willamette Week yesterday put up a short, skeptical story on the state's experiment in a GPS-based mileage tax. The piece provides a nice overview of just why many reasonable people find the idea to be -- shall we be kind? -- of questionable merit.
For those unfamiliar with the concept, the Oregon Department of Transportation has been flirting with replacing the gas tax with a tax based on mileage. The reasoning behind the proposal goes something like this: gas prices have climbed rapidly, and as a result automobile maker are making more efficient vehicles. The first major breakthrough was the ever-present Toyota Prius, but now even major domestic producers like Chevy are in the game, bringing in even large SUV hybrids to market, and threatening a pseudo-electric car. As it is, Portland allegedly has the highest per-capita ownership of hybrids. Result? Gas sales may plummet, further reducing revenues from the state gas tax, a tax that has not been raised since 1993.
One of the potential answers might be a mileage tax. Such a revenue system would negate the impacts of fuel choice on state revenues, producing a more stable tax base. It sounds like a highly logical solution. But to enact the proposal, there has to be a way to track mileage for each car. ODOT's solution is to put a Global Positioning System based tracking device. As Governing's Kathleen Hunter reports, each device currently costs $200, and there are over 100 million cars in the U.S. today. Why use a national number? As the earlier Willie Week story reports, this isn't a solution that can be implemented by one state alone:
"[Oregon DOT's Jim] Whitty acknowledges it’s unlikely that a small state like Oregon could be the first to implement a mileage tax. 'You have to have a consortium of small states working together on this,' Whitty says. 'Or California would have to get involved. Or the U.S. Department of Transportation.'"
Why involve other states? Pause and consider; what happens when an out-of-state vehicle with no box enters the state? Or will ODOT put up border shacks, and require each vehicle entering the state to get a "loaner" tax box? And if Oregon were the only state with a mileage tax, you can bet that Oregonians won't want to keep paying for miles they drive out-of-state, on top of the local state's gas-based taxes.
My own take on this is that it is yet another snipe hunt in Salem. Throw out the technical considerations for a moment. There still remain a number of problems with the concept.
The first, ODOT is proposing to replace an in-place functional revenue collecting system with a totally new system. This new system will require millions of dollars of R&D. The tax box will add to the cost of new vehicles, essentially asking car buyers to pay for the privilege of being able to be taxed.
Additionally, it appears that we would be unable to make this work alone. So at the same time that the state doesn't have enough money to add a lane to 217 until 2089 -- which even Metro Councilor Rex Burkholder confirms, -- we're spending our money doing other states' R&D for them? Or are we operating under the belief that, if this idea proves feasible, California and Washington -- much less the rest of the states -- will altruistically reimburse us?
Perhaps the most damning aspect of this idea is the total abdication of leadership on the part of the state. The success or failure of the project would be dependent on the decisions made by other states in the region, or possibly the rest of the nation. The people of Oregon, in other words, would have to live with their in-state transportation funding options being decided by people not living in Oregon. If this is to be a system that needs to be nationally implemented, then it ought to be the federal government paying for it, not the cash strapped citizens of our state. Otherwise we are simply pissing away our own purse without any reasonable guarantee that we'll get anything back in return.
And this is all before I've even touched on the civil liberties ramifications. I won't do that here, as it's a deep subject of its own. I am far more concerned with the pragmatic bread-and-butter of how we build and maintain infrastructure anyway. But suffice it to say, those who are concerned about civil freedoms have a big problem with the government owning a GPS device attached to your car that can tell them not just where you are but where you have been.
Meanwhile, after all the money and the hype and the studying, we have a perfectly capable revenue generation system that would cost exactly zero additional dollars to continue to use. If less gas is being sold, then how about we raise the gas tax rate to compensate? As I mentioned earlier, we haven't raised it statewide since 1993. Many communities, having little to no hope in seeing additional state funds, have begun to pursue local gas taxes to fund projects in their region. This is good for them, as revenues from their communities stays local. But that is a two-edged sword: for rural Oregon, where the ratio of cars to miles of highway is far lower, local gas taxes is not such a good deal.
So why not simply raise that tax? Oregonians tend to be naturally skeptical of tax hike proposals. The insularity and opacity of ODOT has lead many citizens to view it with suspicion. Rumor mills speculate that ODOT may face some additional and serious public scrutiny of its budget if it makes requests for more revenue. Yet if the state does nothing, the transportation system could face major deferred maintenance, with that deference most likely being worst in rural areas most distant from Salem and Portland.
There is of course another model. Some states have notably employed the use of tolls to fund major highways. Many have had their own problems, but others such as the Ohio Turnpike have been excellent examples of what can be done with a toll system. The Turnpike serves as a clean, swift, and exceptionally well maintained freeway across the entire length of Ohio. Rates are surprisingly cheap, with most shorter hops being only a few dollars, and the entire 241-mile, cross-state run costing the average passenger vehicle a little over ten dollars. And atop all this, it's publicly owned.
While tolls have never been highly palatable in modern Oregon, they do have a history in the state. In more modern times, toll bridges were quite common, including the Astoria-Megler, the Longview, and the original Interstate Bridges. Most eventually ceased to charge a toll, usually after paying off the debt to build them, although the bridge at Cascade Locks continues to charge a toll. The proposed new I-5 crossing of the Columbia River may follow this historic toll-bridge route as well.
Yet most modern toll-road proposals in Oregon are hopelessly inept. The most recent toll-road proposal in the state is the "Newburg Dundee Bypass". This proposal would have created an eleven-mile, $493 million bypass of existing Oregon Highway 99W, and paid for it by a toll. The operation of this congestion-bypass would have been concessioned to Macquarie Infrastructure Group, a massive multi-national private toll-road operator based in Australia. Eventually, of course, smarter heads penciled it out: Bear Stearns issued a report in July of 2007 that pointed out that the only way to ensure people would even consider the bypass would be to toll the existing highway too, the very road that provides the main streets of at least three towns. Residents, you might be surprised to learn, didn't take too kindly to this idea, and made it a non-starter. Result? Macquarie Infrastructure pulled out of the deal.
But building a short, eleven-mile bypass of pseudo-urban congestion is not anything even in the same league as the Ohio Turnpike. Imagine instead something more ambitious. Consider the entire, 300-mile length of Interstate 5, from the Columbia to California, -- perhaps along with the 90 miles of U.S. 26 from Sandy to Madras -- as a toll-road. Making both highways self-funding would relieve a massive burden from ODOT. If successful the projects could pave the way for tolling other major routes that consume maintenance dollars, such as Interstate 84. It would also allow the department to concentrate gas tax revenues on investments in more rural areas, as well as continue desperately needed investment in non-road projects.
But of course, a plan such as this would require political leadership from the state. We'd rather hide behind the whiz-bang of a fancy technological fix than face growing what Hemingway called cajones. And far more than revenue, that is our true shortfall.
I've been watching with interest for the last month or so as the City of Portland's proposal to rename Interstate Avenue became a political boondoggle. Although I have strong feelings on the matter, I've stayed out of commenting on it, largely because I am not a citizen of fair PDX, and since I don't brook outsiders telling me what to do, I felt it only fair to practice what I preach. But the notion of rewriting history is such an anathema to me that I just can't keep my mouth shut. It's a pretty typical failing of mine.
For those who haven't followed along, in September of this year, the City of Portland proposed renaming Interstate Avenue for the labor activist Cesar Chavez. Chavez is best known for having begun a unionization of farm laborers, and is considered a heroic figure by many in the Mexican and Latino communities. If the renaming takes place, Chavez would join Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King as the third non-Portlander to have a street renamed for them in recent memory. After having... questionably... rushed through the renaming of Portland Boulevard to Rosa Parks Way in 2006, this renaming struck home with many on Interstate as highly inappropriate. For one, the neighborhoods had recently emerged with a new and positive identity hinged on the Interstate name, thanks largely to the opening of a light rail line down the avenue in 2003. Dubbed "Interstate MAX", it helped to cement the identity as a positive moniker at long last. But more recently, the city began considering an up-zoning program that would replace large swaths of single and dual story housing and commercial space with 4-and-higher story condominiums and apartments. Already agitated by this dramatic proposed change, the city stepped in to suggest a street renaming to go along with it.
Apparently, someone turned the water up too fast on the frog, and the frog jumped.
Angry residents have now crowded at least two public meetings to voice opposition. Lined up against them are activists from the Mexican and Latino community who believe that Chavez deserves an honored place in Portland, despite having no direct personal connection to the city. While some got ugly and uttered harsh words regarding the place of the Mexican community within the city, there is a much less harsh truth behind the rhetoric; whether or not you agree Chavez ought to be honored, there is no connection in any way between Chavez and the neighborhoods along Interstate. The black, Polish, German, or Scandanavian heritages are or were all important to this street, but no Latin cultures have ever had a strong presence here. There is no relevance between Chavez and Insterstate, unlike, say, Rosa parks or MLK and the streets that their names were applied to.
In the end, though, any renaming is something that should be undertaken with care. To add to the history of a city is one thing, but to rewrite it is another. It is said that those who forget their past are doomed to repeat it; a casual attitude about history is foolishness. Renaming Interstate to Cesar Chavez Boulevard isn't a bad idea because Interstate is a distinctive name, or because Chavez doesn't deserve honoring, but because of the process such a renaming reflects; it's a process of systemic history editing. (For more excellent coverage of the history of Interstate, as well as the name change controversy, see this post at Dan Haneckow's excellent blog, Cafe Unknown.)
Sadly, it seems a human penchant to rewrite our past in an attempt to make a more expedient present. How often we bow to the force of PC -- during WW1, it was fashionable to bash Germans, and many a Schmidt became a Smith, and you stuck Liberty Cabbage on your hot-dog, instead of Saurkraut on your Bratwurst. How the Hamburger survived with it's name intact is only to be guessed. I am also reminded of a peculiarly suburban plague, the "named subdivision". I can't count how many times that a plaque on a pile of bricks at the corner of the latest cracker-box subdivision gets accepted by new residents as if it is a neighborhood identity rather than a simple real-estate branding that a developer installed. "I live in the Arbor Arms neighborhood". The what? A new one opened up at the rate of about one a week during the 1990s, and none of them had any relation to history. Thankfully, when TriMet extended light rail to Washington County, they resurrected station names from the old Oregon Electric interurban whose right-of-way it used, not only preserving but rediscovering the history of the area.
It seems to me that the City of Portland didn't anticipate the kind of reaction it would get with this renaming proposal. Some Commissioners -- notably the crotchety Randy Leonard -- are already triangulating their way into an escape route that lets them out of renaming Interstate without giving up on the idea of naming a street for Chavez. Perhaps he remembers, as does a historian friend of mine, the potential third rail that can be uncovered when you threaten a neighborhood in Portland with drastic change; the Mount Hood Freeway proposal of the 1970s lead to the "neighborhood association revolution" that catapulted Neil Goldschmidt into power and swept away the stodgy status-quo Portland government of the era. The only surprise to me is, how long until mayoral wannabe Sam Adams rides Randy's triangulating coat-tails on this one?
Milwaukie-based Mass Tram America hopes to build wind turbines and solar-panel structures from Troutdale to Mount Hood. They would be used as power and infrastructure for a tram system that would carry passengers and freight -- ultimately nationwide.
This proposal, on the other hand, is nothing like that. It does not have the backing of heavy hitters like the City of Portland, or Homer Williams, or OHSU, nor would it involve world-class Swiss engineering firms to build the cars.
Instead, this is a proposal by a "privately owned" (read no-one was stupid enough to invest in it) aerial tram company based in, of all places, cosmopolitan Milwaukie, Oregon! The company, known as Mass Tram America, Inc., appears to be the latest in pie-in-the-sky transportation "consultant" firms that are attempting to huckster our small-time cities out of planning dollars. (See similar recent efforts by "consultant headhunters" regarding a wine train to McMinnville.) MTA has no experience designing or building trams anywhere. The company principles consist of a former realtor and coin-operated carwash operator, and a lower-level Bank of America sales staffer and interior designer. MTA has nobody with education and experience in transportation or manufacturing.
Their idea is to build a nationwide network of aerial trams carrying freight and passengers both. It's Jack Bogdanski's worst nightmare. (At least this time Vera Katz isn't playing cheerleader.) The trams would utilize modified former Boeing airframes as tram cars. The ironic thing is there is some precedent for such an improbable design: see the Mount Hood Skyway, which operated using converted busses.
Still, you can't help but feel that if these folks at MTA were approaching somebody like the City of Portland or Metro, they'd be laughed out of the building before they even got a chance to talk to the decision makers. Troutdale, though, seems to be entertaining them, as if MTA really had the ability to do more than put pretty watercolor design concepts on an amateurish website.
From an unlikely, conservative source, Forbes.com has a very interesting piece by Nicole Gelinas about the need of capitalist societies for publicly funded infrastructure, and how the U.S. is falling down on this duty in the face of calls for privatization.
Conservatives think the private sector will mend the nation's crumbling infrastructure. They're wrong.
I am a conservative who thinks that conservatives and liberals alike have blown it on one of the nation's most important issues: infrastructure spending. While politicians find new ways to spend money on Medicare even in the face of a looming entitlement crisis, our nation's roads, bridges, airports and dams are crumbling. Roads and bridges may be boring, unsexy. But they are the backbone of tomorrow's capitalist economy. We ignore them at our peril.
Some conservatives may reason that if there were really a problem, the private sector would step in and fix things in pursuit of profit. Isn't that how it works in a capitalist society? Indeed, the private sector could play a bigger role. But it can't replace rational public planning and investment.
A refreshing, thought-provoking read. We would be fortunate indeed if such pragmatism were to return to American civics.