route99west.com

Back to Contents

The Addendum

"I tried to write shorter

but I ran out of time"

~Mark Twain

 



route99west.com/addendum
is an occasional journal of Oregon, from arts and books to public policy & transportation.


All content © 2006- by Alexander B. Craghead, except where otherwise noted.

 Powered by Blogger

 OrBlogs Listed



Feeds & Etc

 Atom Feed

 RSS Feed

 Add to Technorati Favorites



Quick Subject Jump

Book Reviews



Previous Posts

Review: Here There Nowhere

The Ephemeral 'Net

Meet the G9

Portland Streetcar Obamamania

Bachelor's Special #1: Instant Noodles Review

Week in Review... in review.

Week in Review, Vol. XI

Week in Review, Vol. X

Week in Review, Vol. IX

Blogroll Additions



Archives

January 2005

July 2005

January 2006

February 2006

August 2006

September 2006

November 2006

January 2007

April 2007

May 2007

June 2007

July 2007

October 2007

November 2007

December 2007

January 2008

February 2008

March 2008

April 2008

July 2008



Other Notable Blogs

Cafe Unknown
Travel, History and Portland Oregon by Dan Haneckow

Jack Bog's Blog
By Jack Bogdanski of Portland, Oregon. (Like he needs any other introduction by now? -- A.B.C.)

For Portlanders Only
"Why buy a mattress anywhere else?"

Good Stuff NW
Featuring stuff that is good in the NW

LOST Magazine
LOST Magazine is an online monthly magazine that combines elements of many other literary, online, and national magazines with a singular mission--to reclaim in writing lost people, places, and things.

Mapes on Politics
Way West of the Beltway

Outside Is America
A journal about photography, roadtrips, trains and life, with occasional detours into movies, baseball, music, family and more.

The Photographers' Railroad Page
Good photos usually have good stories to go with them.... The goal of The Photographers' Railroad Page is to provide an outlet for top quality photographs and their story.

Portland Food & Drink
Throwing Ourselves on the Grenade of Bad Food to Save You

Portland Transport Blog
A Conversation About Access & Mobility in the Portland/Vancouver Region

PowellsBooks.Blog
Authors, readers, critics, media -- and booksellers

Rambling West
The musings of a farmer with a typewriter and camera

Stumptown Confidential
Documenting Portland, Oregon architecture, history, and culture through photos, postcards, and words.

The Unauthorized Observer
Observations on faith, photography, trains, baseball, the city where I live (Fullerton, Calif.), anything that I find funny (a lot of things) or irritating (some things) and various incidents involving friends and family.

Under the Weather
...the open road, fatherhood, family life, music, railroads, photography, popular and unpopular culture, sex, violence, religion, the oppression of consumerism and capitalism and the general bullshit that makes up modern life.

Urban Planning Overlord
A blog to counter the myths, lies, and demagoguery others use against sound city planning to further their own ends, fair and foul - but also to urge the profession itself to pull back from the occasional wretched PC exces.

VanPortlander
Living in Vancouver; working in Portland. I have some thoughts.

Whiskey, Texas
...life and experiences in Texas and the Southwest. Recurring themes: Photography, railroads, fading ads / ghost signs, fallen-flag railroad logos, boxcars, bicycling, Texas music, pop culture, sports, road trips, literature, kids and family.

World Scott
The Travel Writing and Photography of Scott Lothes


Blegs & Bargains

 Amazon Book Wishlist

 B&H Wishlist

 My eBay Listings



 Powell's Books Wishlist

   


Saturday, July 5, 2008


The Ephemeral 'Net

I can still remember, as a child, my mother's big oaken desk. It was sturdy, if a little worn, with a black blotter top and drawers that were heavy and deep. It was always a cornucopia of sensations: sticky translucent yellow glue, a Swingline stapler in a very 1970s dusky pink, stamps with perforated edges from back in the day when you had to lick the backs to make them stick to anything. There were tons of multicolored pens lurking in the lap drawer, most dry and useless. There was almost always a bottle of ink, with an acrid, new-rain smell and a color somewhere south of violet and north of blue sky blue. When I think back to that desk it is no wonder that I became a nut about ephemera.

The desk serves on today, but with slightly less pizazz. While it still holds checkbooks and postage and envelopes and the like, it also serves as a stand for a three year old iMac. I'm reminded of my own "desk" a bit, and the war that always goes on between the space my computer takes up and the space I need to spread out my eight-and-a-half-by-eleven redundant memory aides. (They used to call that paper in the 20th century.)

Earlier today I used my computer and the incredible power of the Internet for a very non-technical purpose: to find labels. You know the type: gum backed, with a little foil edge, the kind that used to go on the marbled covers of composition books, the kind that used to lurk n my mother's desk. I didn't find any, but much like when I go searching Wikipedia, I ended up making what a friend calls a "wiki-tree" of strange ephemeral goodness. Follow along, all you fellow paper geeks!

First up is Donovan Beeson, who makes various handmade stationery products and sells them on her Etsy page. Handmade envelopes, custom journals, shipping labels. All very cool stuff. Donovan also has a blog, Murmurs and Musings, which focuses naturally enough on the lost world of paper. While browsing through her archives, I found a post point towards sarcastic stationer 16 Sparrows, who had begun a campaign known as the "Letter Writer's Alliance". (You can buy LWA stationery here.) The LWA mission is, and I quote:

"In this era of instantaneous communication, a handwritten letter is a rare and wondrous item. The Letter Writers Alliance is dedicated to preserving this art form; neither long lines, nor late deliveries, nor increasing postal rates will keep us from our mission. As a member of the Letter Writers Alliance, you will carry on the glorious cultural tradition of letter writing. You will take advantage of every opportunity to send tangible correspondence. Prepare your pen and paper, moisten your tongue, and get ready to write more letters!"
I always find it amusing to see the net used for these sorts of projects. Paper hasn't died, it's just become a fashion symbol! It's probably no surprise this kind of thing is up my alley, after all I do shop a Blue Moon Camera and Machine.

Another source for ephemeral goodness is PodPost. Sadly, their "Pod Post Mail Art Bento" is out of stock. Too bad, too, it combines all my love of ephemera and otakuness in one convenient bundle. Drat!

As I skipped along, I also ran into busynest cards. Busynest focuses on a very lost art -- the calling card. There's some really nice graphic design work here. These cards really do drive home the odd mixture the Internet has brought about: an out-of-date practice (calling cards) married to a very sleek and modern graphic design and sold worldwide over the 'Net. The 21st century is a strange place.

As for calling cards themselves? This page has the scoop on what they were and why. Interesting tidbits: a calling card doesn't include where you work, and includes your profession only if it gives you a title (M.D., General, etc...), as including your place of work or firm makes the card a business card, and therefore socially inappropriate to leave as a calling card:
"it was considered to be in very poor taste to use a business card when making a social call. A business card, left with the servants, could imply that you had called to collect a bill."
Interestingly, what we consider today to be a business card -- flashy pictures, promotional saying, establishment name displayed prominently, and so forth -- was not at that time considered a business card at all, but a "trade card".

Now, where did I put my Fedora?

Labels: , , ,

Posted By ABC at | 3 Comments

Back to Top | Back to Contents




Friday, March 28, 2008


Portland Streetcar Obamamania

Can we have a time-out on the whole streetcar expansion thing?

Recently, the Oregonian printed a story on the impending Portland Streetcar System Plan. What's really interesting is to compare the system's proposed map, (as shown here in a Big O rendering,) with historic maps of the Portland Traction system, such as this one from 1924. They are amazingly similar.

The historian/nostalgist in me thinks this is really really cool. The pragmatist in me has a warning. One of the -- if not the primary -- goals of streetcar construction is development. This is nothing new really. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, streetcar lines were built to areas like Sunnyside or Council Crest specifically with development in mind. They opened up farmland to become subdivision stock, making fast commutes from outlying areas possible for the first time. In many cases lines were "aimed" into areas where land was empty and cheap.

And this puts the first hurdle in the way of the Streetcar System Plan: by largely copying the old Portland Traction alignments, it is adhering to a development pattern of a century ago, and not necessarily of today. This puts redevelopment smack in the middle of some of Portland's more vital neighborhoods. Do we really want or need to tear up Hawthorne or Belmont to install multi-story condo developments? Because that's one of the likely results of putting a streetcar in on these streets.

* * *

There's another problem too, and it also requires a brief history lesson.

Portland's now lamented streetcar system morphed into today's TriMet bus system. Most of the areas that Portland Traction's trolly lines established are the primary neighborhoods of today. Due to this, TriMet's bus routes mimic to an amazing degree the former streetcar lines, and in many cases can directly trace their existence to them, having evolved from streetcar to trolly-bus to diesel bus.

If the streetcar were about transportation, and not development, it might make a lot of sense to build these lines. It is, after all, where a lot of people are going to and from today.

But... uh... what about the buses?

By replicating the old Portland Traction routes, the Portland Streetcar is making a financial stab at the heart of TriMet's territory. Until now, the streetcar served primarily as a people mover in the downtown area, where most of the TriMet service is free anyway. The eastside streetcar loop is starting to get into TriMet's transportation territory, but could be considered as no more than a downtown extension over to the central eastside. There is no question that installing a second transit alternative on the exact same corridors as frequent service TriMet buses will effect bus boardings, and as a result TriMet farebox revenues.

It's the transit equivalent of Julius Ceaser's 49 BC march across the Rubicon river. It might be speculated that TriMet doesn't look too kindly on this streetcar plan, and I can't blame them. It wouldn't surprise me at all if the workers on S.E. 17th found themselves voting for Sho Dozono over streetcar guru Sam Adams for mayor.

* * *

There's another issue of course, and it's just a small one: financing.

Although streetcars are far cheaper than light rail to build, they are far less popular with the Federal Transit Administration. One of the main reasons behind this is that streetcars just don't carry that many people. They serve as people movers or local pedestrian circulators, but they don't serve commute functions to any significant degree.

What streetcars do well is bring in economic development. It's one of the reasons I greatly admire the mode, and think they are good things to build. However, it's also something that is hard to quantify, and the FTA currently does not use economic development indicators as a significant tool in deciding how to make expenditures of federal funds.

The current 8-mile streetcar loop (4 miles each way) weighs in at a total construction cost of approximately $87 million. To establish bidirectional service, then, each mile would cost around $22 million. It doesn't take much staring at the proposed system map to see that the extensions outweigh the current system by many times. If there is no federal money, where will the financing come from? Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) cannot raise the money all on their own.

* * *

These are hardly the only issues. How, for example, will the streetcar fare against congestion? They can't weave around traffic impediments like buses can. The cars themselves cost about the same as three standard TriMet buses -- and for the money that means TriMet buses can offer more frequent service at a higher passenger capacity for the same money -- and without the need to tear up city streets.

But is this all academic? Does Adams really intend to build this many streetcar lines? Or is he applying his Machiavellian brand of politics to Portland, by making campaign promises he has no intention of keeping? It should be noted that by proposing streetcars for all the historic routes, he touches on Portland's brand of self-involved nostalgia while also promising "a streetcar in every pot" for nearly every neighborhood in the city.

Does any of this plan make sense? Perhaps. Certainly the peninsula of North Portland is under-served by transit, but I suspect that a better approach would be a spur line of Expo MAX, perhaps to a transit center in St. Johns or even beyond in Rivergate.

A better idea would be to install the streetcar along Sandy out to Parkrose. Sandy Boulevard is in many places well behind the times, and ripe for redevelopment. Its diagonal route cuts across so many neighborhoods that it would spread the economic impact of the project more than any other single proposal on the system plan map. It would still have impacts on TriMet service, however the 12 bus that serves Sandy is already over capacity and slow; any additional service here would be welcome. Most of all, it would help to turn over a strip of road that desperately needs public attention, which means that it's a relevant redevelopment for 21st century Portland. The fact that it's also someplace Portland Traction once ran would be a nice symmetry, but no more.

Most of all, however, what I feel we need is a breather. Streetcar building is not an end-all answer to every need the city has, and we need to stop giving it a Barack Obama-like mania. Yes, it's cool. But transportation should be designed with a clear and level head.

Labels: , , , , ,

Posted By ABC at | 2 Comments

Back to Top | Back to Contents




Friday, February 22, 2008


Week in Review, Vol. XI

Pronouncements of doom for various car styles have always amused me. Some time ago, my mother covered a screen with newspaper clippings of British sports cars -- the covers of magazines, newspaper articles, even classified advertisements. One of the articles is written in the late 1970s, and predicted the doom of the convertible. New U.S. safety standards, you see, made them inherently unsafe, and therefore it was only a matter of time before they would be gone from the market, a memory from the past.

Yeah. Right.

Well, now it's the muscle car's turn.

* * *

While in the world of transportation, it appears the Washington State Ferries sytem is in trouble. WS-DOT is even proposing a restructuring.

The mess gave me one of those "what ever happened to" moments regarding Mike Thorne. You might recall that Thorne used to be director of Port of Portland and quit to run for governor. When he dropped out of the race, he went to run the ferries in Washington.

So what's become of Mike? And can he be blamed (rightly or wrongly) for any of Washington's water-borne mess? Well he quit the ferry job in 2004 and returneed to Pendleton. As Seattle Times staff writer Susan Gilmore put it in 2004,
"He said he came into the job with huge expectations, that he'd be able to achieve financial footing with no plan how to get there. Raising ferry fares drove away customers, voters rejected Referendum 51, which would have dumped billions of dollars into state transportation projects, and there were no plans how to replace the aging state ferries, some 70 years old."
And now? Notice that "Big Look" land use review that the legislature wants to fund? Thorne's a member. That may or may not mean anything -- put your tinfoil conspiracy hats on now if you wish -- but I find it an interesting path for someone who thought themselves a gubernatorial contender.

Which brings up another question: what ever happened to Ron Saxton?

* * *

Also up in Seattle, the Big O reports that it may only be a matter of time before the Sonics move to Oklahoma. The single commenter on the Big O's story says "who cares".

I have a question for you, ladies and gentleman. Who owns the Blazers? Where does he live? And what might he do if Seattle no longer had a pro basketball team?

* * *

Lastly, a food related story. Author Michael Pollan has been making the local circuit here lately, sending parts of the Portland food blogosphere into titters. Why? Pollan has written a book that dares to suggest that we should eat food, not "food substitutes".

Pollan has some interesting things to say, and Edible Portland sat down and did a video interview with him. The first part is here. I found Pollan's comments about Sour Cream and tofu-based meat substitutes to be so common-sense based that I had to pinch myself that I was hearing these words at all. Can it be? Might sugar and butter be... acceptable? It's so sad to think that Julia Child -- who seemed to improve any recipe by adding either butter or "booze" to it -- didn't live to see this day.

That's all for now.

Labels: , , , , ,

Posted By ABC at | 0 Comments

Back to Top | Back to Contents




Saturday, October 20, 2007


The Cat and Her Nine Lives

My love of British cars -- or at least those that were deemed worthy of export to the United States -- should be no secret. I grew up in the back seat of a heavily modified red 1959 Triumph TR3. Over the years, members of my family have owned TR4's, TR6's, MGBs, MGB-GTs, Sunbeam Alpines, Austin-Healy Sprites... and that's all just in my lifetime! The car I perhaps have heard the most about, however -- after the TR3 anyway -- was a Mark II 3.8 Jaguar saloon. Made most famous as the car that BBC/PBS' Inspector Morse drove, my parents owned a Burgundy red model until the late 1970s. It fell victim to the expanding family disease, and my only first-hand knowledge of it comes from a burled wood dashboard spare that my father has kept ever since. It is a very nice dashboard.

So it shouldn't be a surprise that growing up, I lusted after Jaguars, first the XJS, then later the XK. It's perhaps because of this that I've always held a soft spot for the Jaguar car company, and cheered it on even while knowing I was far from likely to be able to own one anytime in the foreseeable future. When the troubled maker announced the new C-XF concept, I was fascinated, and wrote about it here. Stylish, ultra-modern, and shapely, the car broke many Jaguar traditions in an attempt to hold up one very crucial one, the notion of a sedan that had guts, what Jag designer Ian Callum called, in typically British jargon, a "sports saloon".

Jaguar's in a deep bind, and its troubles are much the same as Cadillac's had been for the last twenty years, namely being the "fuddy-duddy" car, with little excitement or passion. Result? Declining sales and a shrinking, increasingly geriatric buyer base. Not exactly a growth formula. Some of the U.S. executives of the company hatched a plan to save the company in 2004 that would have seen the maker return to it's racing-inspired roots. The plan, however, was killed by defenders of the status-quo.

Now, however, the upper echelon at the Cat seems to have learned the hard lesson. Sales of the X-Type, meant to be an All-Wheel-Drive BMW-killer, never met expectations, while time has shown the S-Type to be an over-styled poor substitute for the Mark II whose styling it more parodies than parrots. Ford has put the company up for sale, placing all the more pressure on the company to prove itself healthy enough to be bought for more than just a Chinese name-badge grab.

Make no mistake. Jaguar needs the XF. Since revealing the C-XF, (Concept, XF), Jaguar removed the X-Type from the U.S. market; the XF production variant of the C-XF will, once it hits the market, replace both of Jaguar's middle-market sedans. If it succeeds, Jaguar will prove itself a viable investment. If it fails, it may sink the company.

But what would it look like? Production cars, industry wide, are rarely as exciting as the concept cars they are based upon. Despite raising pulse rates, concepts are usually far watered down, in fear of the risk of aggressive styling losing the pre-existing customer base for the product. Caddy's angular transition was perhaps one of the rare exceptions to this rule. (It's also one that's paying off well -- the CTS has proven a winner for Cadillac owner GM). Would Jaguar follow the rule, and water down the C-XF to a milquetoast sedan?

Recently, Jaguar revealed the new XF. The exterior styling is by far more conservative than the C-XF, most notably reducing the radical headlight shapes and toning the overall body shape into a more submissive shape. Ironically like the Cadillac CTS, in some ways photos do not do justice to the styling. At first, this was a disappointment, but I have to admit the styling has grown on me. This photo alone sells me on the heartbeat racing Jaguar feel the car has, in a way that no XJ series sedan, even the original XJ-6 of 1968, has had.

And the interior? While not quite as dramatic as the neon-glow infused C-XF interior, it still sports a clean minimal look heralded by some as the best luxury sports sedan interior on the market. Indeed, from a functional standpoint, it was designed with Apple Computer, known for their elegant interfaces. Note, too, the return of that Jaguar standby, burled wood trim. While a step into the past, the treatment appears to me modern enough not to be an anchor, while traditional enough to satisfy the need for some warmth as well as brand continuity.

What does it translate to for Jaguar? With such an iconic brand, any step away from the inertia of conservative, backward-looking designs will be met with a love-hate reaction. As Car Magazine UK states, "some insiders call it a Marmite design -- one whose flavour you'll either love or hate." The maker has rolled its dice... and it looks promising. Early reports indicate that there are now more U.S. pre-orders for the XF than supply; in short the XF appears to be on the path to selling out its first batch on U.S. soil.

And if you're Jaguar, you're hoping that's going to last more than a few months.

Labels: , , ,

Posted By ABC at | 0 Comments

Back to Top | Back to Contents




Thursday, June 21, 2007


Online slideshow navigation

Online Journalism Review has web-published a review of slideshow navigation for web image presentations. While this may be a bit dry at first, for many of us building web sites, this is very interesting research. The biggest surprise? Almost nobody in their study used thumbnails.

Labels: , , ,

Posted By ABC at | 0 Comments

Back to Top | Back to Contents




Sunday, May 6, 2007


Jaguar's 21st Century Gamble

Jaguar is perhaps one of the most respected British car makers. It is also one of the few traditional British makers to have survived the dark years of British Leyland and arrived in the 21st century. Since 1989, Jaguar has been owned by U.S. automaker Ford Motor Company. Ford has for the most part avoided direct involvement in the company, but Jaguar has utilized Ford technology in recent designs such as the XK8.

The Ford era ushered in an era of nostalgia at Jaguar. The car that is most symbolic of this is Jag's "S-Type". The car was meant to hearken back to the classic lines of the Mark II, one of the icons of Jaguar's "sports saloon" heritage. Unfortunately, the car's design was more like a cartoon of its inspiration. Execution was rather tame and conventional, instead of exciting.

While browsing the net the other night, I discovered Jaguar's promotional site for its advanced design concept. Called the CXF, its is a prototype for the the to-be-launched Jaguar XF, a 4 door sports sedan. The car is meant to break with every trapping of Jaguar tradition -- burled woods, cream leather, &c -- while at the same time honoring the brand's spirit of speed, modernism, and design excellence.

The CXF is distinctively like no car ever produced by Jaguar. The exterior uses a stretched, athletic shape that is erotically fast without sacrificing elegance. It hearkens slightly to the XK, although one might be inclined to view the latter as more having a kinship than being an inspiration for the former. Yet the radically different shape does have some subtle Jaguar "notes". The CXF has an overall arc shape that is like a metaphor for the leaping cat logo. It also has a subtle horizontal curvature when viewed from each end. But again, these are subtleties. The interior is almost spartan in simplicity, and yet is flowing, elegant, and radically modern. Overall, the car exhibits what Julian Thomson, Chief Designer for Jaguar Advanced Design, calls a more "aggressive" side of the brand.

Does it succeed? I think it does, though that is not the same thing as me liking the car. I'm not yet sure how I feel about the CXF. I can say this: I do get excited when I look at the car. It is a breathtaking change with the past. It cannot be confused for the milktoast of the S-Type or the suburban boredom of the X-Type. It makes every other luxury car on the market or planned for the market look boring, conventional, stone age. I wonder though if it breaks too far from the Jaguar mould, whether the Jaguar base will embrace it as a "true" Jag. Yet even if the brand loses some of the traditionalists, I suspect that the design of the CXF is so advanced that it will prove a formidable opponent for other luxury automobile companies.

The CXF's design concept website can be viewed here.

Labels: , , ,

Posted By ABC at | 0 Comments

Back to Top | Back to Contents